Red Herring - Straw Man
David Nollmeyer
Authorized Autobiographical Site
Disclaimer - All work done on powereality.org, powereality.com, nollmeyer.com or or any other site linked on the pages on the homepage are by David Nollmeyer born 8-3-1961 in Roswell NM. There is a USPS mail carrier in Florida, most likely a relative who LAPD states is advocating me. No relatives are involved on these sites.

Flagstaff AZ
5-20-07
In informal logic a Red Herring - Straw Man are related informal fallacies used to describe a concept of ad hominem and invalid argumentation. Attacks against the person as being a communist or a homosexual are classic examples of a Red Herring. Straw Man arguments are made against an imaginary position which is NOT held by the person one is attacking. Here LAPD simply will isolate and invent positions consisting of veneers, irrational conclusionary statements, and then falsely attribute such to me. In isolation I cannot confront these false cases. These arguments will simply fall apart from lack of substance.
The reason to write a paper simply on this subject is existential and real. Twenty years of totalitarian isolation, censorship, and sanitization leave no other choice.
LAPD will call themselves a Gay Militia. This is important. I will not trade off any natural or civil right to any militia Gay or Straight thus violating positive civil rights. The environmental damage to property in the United States is GREAT. If persons are supporting this element they are also attacking the government and themselves.
I know my own life better than anyone else. It is easy to refute these allegation of being Gay or Bisexual.
LAPD has created the greatest damage to the LGBT movement. Their record as law enforcement officials shall also come under greater scrutiny.
Since 1986 I have been severely harassed without due process of law. Since June 17, 1987 there has been a manifest 24 hour continual bombardment of electronic surveillance and scorched earth. This has been lead by four principals:
Los Angeles Police Department
Delaware State Police
Baltimore Police Department
The Baltimore Studio or The Studio
The LAPD and the Baltimore Studio are Gay - Bisexual. Herein there are
some twenty members of LAPD and seven members of the Baltimore Studio. I am a
lifelong heterosexual. By measures of behaviorism I have never engaged in any
same sex contact. By cognition, my gender identity always has been heterosexual
for all of my forty five years of life.
Any evidence produced therefore must be fabricated or mutilated.
In this instance LAPD has invented a fictitious parallel history of events in my life. This is facilitated by The Baltimore Studio and a Synclavier sampling piano which can accurately imitate sounds as my voice. What occurs is the gay or bisexual encounters are fabricated from events that are recorded from law enforcement surveillance. The evidence will have my voice substituted for a male participating in some type of same sex encounter.
This material will most likely be held by the Delaware State Police, Berkeley City Police, or the San Diego Police Department. Mutilated fabrications are most likely held by LAPD. It is not historically logical for this agency to have any naturally occurring recordings of my life until after 1990 when I lived in Santa Monica.
Totalitarianism seeks to isolate the individual or the collective from the whole.
I AM OPENLY STATING FOR THE RECORD THAT MY AUTHORIZED PAPERS WILL LEAD TO AN ACCURATE PORTRAYAL OF MY LIFE. THIS WILL OCCUR THROUGH DIRECT EVIDENCE.
It is unique to note that LGBT community has not attempted to recognize the scorched earth event that has been imposed over me for the last twenty years. They however, in certain locations as Oregon and California are attempting to have the accomplishments of this community taught in high school and at other levels similar to African American History is taught.
There is an attempt to create a gay or bisexual hero here. If one emerges it would not be me. I am not stating that this will not happen but if such does this person is going to have to decapitate this extortion and blackmail ring and recognize that I am a heterosexual and will deliver a very strong conservative response against any element that wishes to be an agent in my torture, slander, and libel of person.
David Nollmeyer
Born 1961 - Roswell NM
Malicious Abuse
To date events concerning: 1. Richard Miller - Delaware 2. Russell Gaines - Delaware 3. Luc - Berkeley CA - Switzerland have been fabricated. This is severe and will definitely not go uncontested at the strongest level of law and history.
I have to add the name of one of my old Berkeley roommates, as to who The Baltimore Studio aka The Studio are using digital technology to gay bait persons. I am not responsible for his behavior. He was an out bisexual and I was moving from Berkeley and the landlord picked him to move in. (In Berkeley about 30 to 40 percent of the population is at least bisexual). As seen these individuals and their task masters are the LGBT elements. This material is then handed off to handpicked cronies in the Delaware State Police or other law enforcement.
The person's name is Luc. He is now perhaps married. When I lived in Berkeley in 2006 my landlord picked this person. My relationship with him was strictly Platonic. The landlord had a relationship with Luc.
It is apparent that in the long run there will be a latent function to create a LGBT myth concerning my relationship with Luc. The landlord of my apartment brought Luc in to live, not me. This appears to be the work of LAPD. His private life was with others and not me. As seen I cannot even remember his last name. There may be a bogus attempt lead from above by LGBT advocate groups or interests as the film industry to malign my perspectives which are socially conservative. Look for more elaboration on this point if there is an escalation.
Currently The Studio have mutilated evidence stating that I have been bisexual with now departed Richard Miller of Dover, Delaware at Red Bridges, Maryland. This is ludicrous. There are already other legal records against the Delaware State Police regarding this type of slander.
An earlier owner and crew of The Studio is also to have allegedly falsified a taped surveillance claiming I had consensual sex with Russell Gaines of Delaware. Russell touched me in an inappropriate manner. This was not consensual. I did not press charges because Russell would of went prison. LAPD and The Studio are malicious. I have had to report this issue to the Attorney General's Office of The State of Delaware.
http://powereality.org/baltimorestudio.htm
Summary
A point of departure to organize the fallacies and fictions is to utilize principles from classic philosophy. This is due to the inherent nature of the movers to attempt to create a universal identity of which the largest possible population could identify with or validate the falsified arguments. This is one of three ordered laws which will bind consequent arguments. They are:
Eternal Law - This is essentially any authorized faith or God based argument.
Natural Law - These are the laws of nature. Arguments at this level may be connected to Eternal Law or be atheistic. Philosophic arguments pertaining to the mind of humans also fall into place here. In relation to scientific determinism all events reduce to physics.
Positive Law - This is the legal standing code.
Prisoner's Dilemma
Many points in this article may be difficult to understand without a background in the elementary concepts of game theory.
Will two prisoners cooperate to minimize total loss of liberty or will one of them, trusting the other to cooperate, betray him so as to go free?
In game theory, the prisoner's dilemma is a type of non-zero-sum game in which two players can "cooperate" with or "defect" (i.e. betray) the other player. In this game, as in all game theory, the only concern of each individual player ("prisoner") is maximizing his/her own payoff, without any concern for the other player's payoff. In the classic form of this game, cooperating is strictly dominated by defecting, so that the only possible equilibrium for the game is for all players to defect. In simpler terms, no matter what the other player does, one player will always gain a greater payoff by playing defect. Since in any situation playing defect is more beneficial than cooperating, all rational players will play defect.
The unique equilibrium for this game is a Pareto-suboptimal solution—that is, rational choice leads the two players to both play defect even though each player's individual reward would be greater if they both played cooperate. In equilibrium, each prisoner chooses to defect even though both would be better off by cooperating, hence the dilemma.
In the iterated prisoner's dilemma the game is played repeatedly. Thus each player has an opportunity to "punish" the other player for previous non-cooperative play. Cooperation may then arise as an equilibrium outcome. The incentive to defect is overcome by the threat of punishment, leading to the possibility of a cooperative outcome. If the game result is infinitely repeated, cooperation may be a Nash equilibrium although both players defecting always remains an equilibrium.
The classical prisoner's dilemma
The Prisoner's dilemma was originally framed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher working at RAND in 1950. Albert W. Tucker formalized the game with prison sentence payoffs and gave it the "Prisoner's Dilemma" name (Poundstone, 1992).
The classical prisoner's dilemma (PD) is as follows:
Two suspects, A and B, are arrested by the police. The police have insufficient evidence for a conviction, and, having separated both prisoners, visit each of them to offer the same deal: if one testifies for the prosecution against the other and the other remains silent, the betrayer goes free and the silent accomplice receives the full 10-year sentence. If both stay silent, both prisoners are sentenced to only six months in jail for a minor charge. If each betrays the other, each receives a two-year sentence. Each prisoner must make the choice of whether to betray the other or to remain silent. However, neither prisoner knows for sure what choice the other prisoner will make. So this dilemma poses the question: How should the prisoners act?
The dilemma can be summarized thus:
|
Prisoner B Stays Silent |
Prisoner B Betrays |
|
|
Prisoner A Stays Silent |
Each serves six months | Prisoner A
serves ten years Prisoner B goes free |
|
Prisoner A Betrays |
Prisoner A
goes free Prisoner B serves ten years |
Each serves two years |
The dilemma arises when one assumes that both prisoners only care about minimizing their own jail terms. Each prisoner has two options: to cooperate with his accomplice and stay quiet, or to defect from their implied pact and betray his accomplice in return for a lighter sentence. The outcome of each choice depends on the choice of the accomplice, but each prisoner must choose without knowing what his accomplice has chosen to do.
Let's assume the protagonist prisoner is working out his best move. If his partner stays quiet, his best move is to betray as he then walks free instead of receiving the minor sentence. If his partner betrays, his best move is still to betray, as by doing it he receives a relatively lesser sentence than staying silent. At the same time, the other prisoner's thinking would also have arrived at the same conclusion and would therefore also betray.
If reasoned from the perspective of the optimal outcome for the group (of two prisoners), the correct choice would be for both prisoners to cooperate with each other (both staying silent), as this would reduce the total jail time served by the group to one year total. Any other decision would be worse for the two prisoners considered together. When the prisoners both betray each other, each prisoner achieves a worse outcome than if they had cooperated.
This demonstrates very elegantly that in a non-zero sum game a Pareto optimum and the Nash Equilibrium can be opposite. In other words, that a non-zero sum game may not have a solution that is both optimal and stable; a Pareto optimum can be unstable and the Nash equilibrium can be sub-optimal.
Alternately, the "Stay Silent" and "Betray" strategies may be known as "don't confess" and "confess", or the more standard "cooperate" and "defect", respectively.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner's_dilemmaHERE I WILL TEMPORARILY END TO CONTINUE AN ELABORATION THAT WILL CONTINUE AT REGULAR INTERVALS.
Links
http://powereality.org
http://powereality.org/journals.htm
http://powereality.org/nollmeyer.htm
http://powereality.org/delaware.htm
http://powereality.org/baltimorestudio.htm
http://powereality.org/strawman.htm
http://powereality.org/lapd.htm
http://powereality.org/inyo.htm
http://powereality.tripod.com/index.htm
http://nollmeyer.tripod.com/journals.htm
http://nollmeyer.tripod.com/cuestacollege.htm
http://powereality.org/capitalpunishment/
http://legaltheory.tripod.com/
http://legaltheory.tripod.com/humeandkant
http://legaltheory.tripod.com/universaljurisdiction/
http://legaltheory.tripod.com/impunity.htm
http://socialtheory1.tripod.com/
http://socialtheory1.tripod.com/dehumanization.htm
http://socialtheory1.tripod.com/impunity.htm
http://socialtheory1.tripod.com/ecologicalsystems
http://socialtheory1.tripod.com/euthanasia/
http://socialtheory1.tripod.com/wto.htm
Foreign Sites
http://members.lycos.co.uk/nollmeyer/
http://members.lycos.nl/nollmeyer/nollmeyer.html
http://mitglied.lycos.de/nollmeyer/
Blogs
http://humanrightsdiscussion.blogspot.com/
http://future-state.blogspot.com/
http://journals.aol.com/vamanadeva/nollmeyer_human_rights_blog/